As with other creationists, our own confirmed Real Science Radio predictions have specifically contradicted the widespread and fundamental expectations of the big-bang and evolutionary camps, making them especially telling regarding the battle of the materialist and biblical worldviews. Even “vague” reply ok. Here are some of the general predictions from Real Science Radio: Partial confirmations appear at rsr. Those using hair, pigment, etc. Also, we will find asteroids with orbiting debris and multiple moons. Likewise, if more early drawings of the moon are found, or perhaps known ones just reexamined, we may find that they reveal features that cannot be seen from Earth today retrodiction added May 15, See more on this prediction at rsr. See more details at rsr.
List of Creation Science Predictions
Time is not the axial rotation of our planet, no matter how hard religious influenced scientist try to force that geocentric outdated ignorance onto man. Make no mistake it is being forced onto our world by a religious institution. This same religious institution once made the world believe it was flat and the universe revolved around our planet… now they have our world believing the universe is flat and time revolves around the individual.
Sorry I have to be the one to expose that as pure nonsense, but those pyramids, and your bible by the way, proves it! For you see the creators of those pyramids not only understood three dimensional volume, they also understood the secret of time… ie… the Star of David… more on that in a few minutes.
애리조나 북부의 그랜드 캐년에서의 고무보트 타기는 정말 짜릿하고 즐거운 경험이다. 협곡의 깊은 바닥에는 결정질 기반암이 험한 콜로라도 강 위로 찌를듯이 솟아있다.
What needs to be shown is that the early chapters constitute a reliable document, with an ancient and natural origin. Here we argue that the source material was part of an oral tradition already known in the third millennium BC. The biblical text is a distillation of that tradition, authenticated, paradoxically, by the very texts that are thought to discredit it. As pointed out in the companion article , written documents cannot have been the source for the first chapters of Genesis.
The story about the Creation and the temptation of the first human couple, together with the genealogies, the history of the antediluvian world and the story of the Deluge, would all have passed down from generation to generation by word of mouth. The same applies to the story about Abraham. While it is not impossible that he could write, Abraham was an Aramean herdsman, not a member of the elite class of scribes and priests, and herdsmen, just as in parts of the world today, had no use for writing.
Thus we can have some confidence that they go back to the man himself. Abraham, the tradition tells us, came from polytheistic Sumer. Every city, it was believed, was ruled by a god and, much like a human king, the god lived in a palace in the midst of the city, present and manifest in his life-like statue. There was one such ziggurat in Ur, home-city of Abraham. Ur served the moon-god Nanna. It was not a place where Abraham could have become acquainted with the monotheistic stories recorded in early Genesis.
Haran, several hundred miles upstream from Ur, can be ruled out for the same reason:
In Her Own Words: Meenakshi Wadhwa
The sun, moon, and stars 2. The fish and the birds 3. The fertile earth 6. The land animals and humans 7. Rest and satisfaction In light of these correspondences, Kline interprets days one and four as different perspectives on the same event, and likewise days two and five, and three and six.
Sep 25, · The sun, at billion years old, predates all the other bodies in our solar system. But it turns out that much of the water we swim in and drink here on Earth is even older.
Photo by Andrew A. A model age is calculated by assuming a value for the original isotopic composition of the molten liquid from which the rock solidified. In the case of K-Ar, it is assumed that when the rock formed, there was no Ar in it derived from radioactive decay of K. An isochron is a graphical plot of the isotopic compositions of the samples. It allows an isochron age to be calculated from a straight line plotted through the graph of the results. The method effectively requires multiple assumptions, namely that the initial isotopic ratio of each sample was the same as the ratio of every other sample in the group.
It is important to note that geologists routinely use only 6—10 samples for plotting isochrons and calculating isochron ages, so the isochrons obtained here from 19—21 samples are exceptional.
Changing Views of the History of the Earth
Several Christian ministries promote the idea that the earth is less than 10, years old, which they say comes from the Bible. In reality, the Bible makes no claim as to the age of the earth, although it does establish a minimum age. This page examines some of the history of the controversy—what the Bible actually says and does not say—and the scientific evidence surrounding the age of the earth.
Age of the earth according to the Bible The following is a summary of the biblical evidence presented on this website regarding the age of the earth. For more detailed explanations of each topic, please click on the associated link. History of the age of the earth As indicated earlier, the Bible does not fix the age of the earth, contrary to the claims of Answers in Genesis.
Yeah, I know, that sounds crazy. But I’m not asking you to believe anything just yet, until you see the evidence for yourself. All I ask is that you refrain from disbelieving while I show you my proof.
Making Sense of the Patterns This three-part series will help you properly understand radiometric dating, the assumptions that lead to inaccurate dates, and the clues about what really happened in the past. Most people think that radioactive dating has proven the earth is billions of years old. After all, textbooks, media, and museums glibly present ages of millions of years as fact.
Yet few people know how radiometric dating works or bother to ask what assumptions drive the conclusions. Each atom is thought to be made up of three basic parts. The nucleus contains protons tiny particles each with a single positive electric charge and neutrons particles without any electric charge.
Some isotopes of some elements are radioactive. Over naturally-occurring isotopes are known. How are isotopes used to calculate the age of rocks. This method is useful for igneous and metamorphic rocks, which cannot be dated by the stratigraphic correlation method used for sedimentary rocks.
The intention communicated here is that the first creation account is to be integrated with the second. Genesis gives the “big picture”, a majestic view of the sweeping scope of all creation, whereas Genesis reveals God’s particular investment in humanity as his crowning work, intended for relationship with him.
Meteorites are among the oldest objects we know about – formed about billion years ago. But how do how mass spectrometer is used in radioactive dating know this. How mass spectrometer is used in radioactive dating How mass spectrometer is used in radioactive dating, the curve in Fig. The Greeks idea was not forgotten and later revived by Boyle and Newton but with little progress.
Isotopes and mass spectrometry article Khan Academy Whenever it is energetically allowed by the mass difference between neighboring isobars, a nucleus Z may capture one of its own atomic electrons and transform to the isobar of atomic number Z – 1. This is a second-order process and so should go much raxioactive than beta decay.
Exploring the wonders of geology in response to young-Earth claims Please read my guidelines and background posts before proceeding! Radiometric dating is not a simple topic.
Secrets of the Giza Pyramids by Charles Marcello Everyone knows we live within a three dimensional universe, and that time equals the fourth dimension. While at the same time just about everyone has heard of E=MC2 the thing is, the Pyramids of Giza has both of those truths intertwined within their legends and their physical makeup.
Leibnitz reworked Descartes’s cosmogony. Protogea was published much later in An essay toward a Natural History of the Earth. Woodward came down fairly strongly for the view that the flood was an act of God that could not be accounted for by normal physical processes. He also postulated hydrological sorting to account for the ordering of fossils. Whiston added comets to Burnet’s cosmogony as the source of the waters of the flood. Lectures and Discourse of Earthquakes and Subterranean Eruptions.
Hooke believed that the fossils were the remains of extinct species and could not be accounted for by the Flood.